Shareholders of Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta are requesting the company “conduct an assessment to determine if adding #Bitcoin to the Company’s treasury is in the best interest of shareholders.

I call it — I want to, but I can’t — a classic corporate dilemma.

On the one hand, Bitcoin is a symbol of the new economy, volatile, but enticing with its prospects and status as “digital gold”. On the other hand, corporations like Meta or Microsoft are machines that are built on predictability and stability. In the meantime stability and Bitcoin are quite opposite concepts.

Taking it into the treasury means admitting that we are ready to take risks for the sake of the future. Not taking it means remaining hostage to the old system, where every dollar must be squeezed out of reports and shares.

But the real problem is different. Bitcoin is no longer about technology, but about symbolism. Companies do not want to simply invest. They want to buy hope. This is an attempt to convince themselves and shareholders that they are not late for the future. But the future can not be bought with one line item on the balance sheet. Real changes require not bets, but the courage to change the system from within.

Elon Musk was not late for the future, when he put Bitcoin in Tesla's portfolio. Or when he invested in the Neuralink project 👉👉 Can Your Brain Outlive Your Body? Neuralink and Holiverse Are Trying to Defeat Death

#Tesla #btc #bitcoin